CEMB vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - CEMB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMB returned 3.49%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

CEMB vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMB achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMB has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 3.49%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.

CEMB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 7.31%
• 3Y*: 7.31%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 3.49%

SLV

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 24.76%
• 1Y: 110.59%
• 3Y*: 45.06%
• 5Y*: 20.76%
• 10Y*: 15.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMB vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF	1.49%	8.86%	5.81%	8.37%	-12.58%	-0.59%	6.77%	13.90%	-2.57%	7.11%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	2.78%	144.66%	20.89%	-1.09%	2.37%	-12.45%	47.30%	14.88%	-9.19%	5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMB and SLV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2012	0.18

CEMB vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CEMB	SLV
Industrials	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CEMB vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMB

CEMB Risk / Return Rank: 69
CEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 47
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMB vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CEMB	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.89	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	2.07	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.35	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.62	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.06	5.64	+5.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEMB vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMB and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEMB	SLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.89	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.58	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.49	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.25	+0.25

Drawdowns

CEMB vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMB drawdown since its inception was -20.84%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMB and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEMB	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.84%	-76.28%	+55.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-42.45%	+39.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.85%	-42.45%	+38.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.48%	-42.45%	+21.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.84%	-42.81%	+21.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-37.30%	+37.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-44.67%	+41.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	19.67%	-19.01%

Volatility

CEMB vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) is 1.08%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that CEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEMB	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	16.30%	-15.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.43%	58.31%	-55.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06%	58.90%	-55.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.63%	36.15%	-30.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.30%	31.84%	-25.54%

CEMB vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CEMB and SLV have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

CEMB vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

CEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF	5.13%	5.14%	5.11%	4.77%	4.29%	3.51%	3.86%	4.19%	4.66%	4.06%	4.26%	4.76%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEMB and SLV in my portfolio?

CEMB and SLV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEMB or SLV?

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to CEMB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEMB dropped -20.84% vs SLV's -76.28%.

Which ETF is better, CEMB or SLV?

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 3.49% for CEMB. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, CEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CEMB or SLV?

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEMB or SLV?

CEMB and SLV have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEMB or SLV?

CEMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

What is the main difference between CEMB and SLV?

CEMB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SLV is Silver. CEMB tracks JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.