PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CELT vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CELT vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CELT

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.77%
YTD
86.06%
6M
95.35%
1Y
297.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CELT
Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF
-19.49%-56.51%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
86.06%-5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and TSMG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CELT vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELT

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CELT vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CELT vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CELTTSMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

Drawdowns

CELT vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CELTTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.79%

Volatility

CELT vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CELTTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.06%

CELT vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CELT vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

CELT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%.


PositionTTM2025
CELT
Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
6.17%11.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


CELT and TSMG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.00% for CELT.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for TSMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CELT and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer