CELT vs. NTSD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.

Performance

CELT vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSD

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 7.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	0.00%
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	17.91%

Return for Risk

CELT vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CELT	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	5.08	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CELT	NTSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.11%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CELT	NTSD	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	24.28%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.28%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.28%	—

CELT vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CELT vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELT nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CELT or NTSD?

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CELT or NTSD?

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CELT or NTSD?

CELT and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CELT and NTSD?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.35% for NTSD.