CELT vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CELT is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

CELT vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 7.14%
• 1M: 201.84%
• YTD: 842.68%
• 6M: 558.01%
• 1Y: 1,215.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-19.49%	-56.51%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	842.68%	-24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and MVLL is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

CELT vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CELT vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CELT	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	9.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	3.33	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CELT	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.02%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-22.42%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CELT	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	60.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	96.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	133.11%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	139.63%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	139.63%	—

CELT vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CELT vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELT nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CELT and MVLL in my portfolio?

CELT and MVLL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CELT or MVLL?

On fees, CELT is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CELT or MVLL?

CELT is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CELT or MVLL?

CELT and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CELT and MVLL?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 1.50% for MVLL.