CELT vs. BLSX
CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and BLSX (Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr ETFs. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
CELT vs. BLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CELT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLSX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CELT vs. BLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF | -19.49% | -54.68% |
BLSX Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -24.41% | -56.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELT and BLSX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELT vs. BLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CELT vs. BLSX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility
CELT vs. BLSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
CELT vs. BLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CELT and BLSX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
CELT vs. BLSX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELT nor BLSX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELT and BLSX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CELT and BLSX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
CELT and BLSX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for CELT and BLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer