CELH vs. PSIX
CELH (Celsius Holdings, Inc.) and PSIX (Power Solutions International, Inc.) are both stocks. CELH operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while PSIX operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CELH returned 44.15%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for PSIX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CELH vs. PSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a -40.71% return, which is significantly higher than PSIX's -47.57% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed PSIX with an annualized return of 44.15%, while PSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.66% annualized return.
CELH
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- 6M
- -51.52%
- YTD
- -40.71%
- 1Y
- -41.44%
- 3Y*
- -17.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 44.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 42.49%
PSIX
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- -22.06%
- 6M
- -61.22%
- YTD
- -47.57%
- 1Y
- -66.53%
- 3Y*
- 117.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $245.11M | $243.55M | $286.15M | |
| $13.85M | $14.17M | $30.95M |
CELH vs. PSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | -40.71% | 73.65% | -51.69% | 57.21% | 39.52% | 48.22% | 941.61% | 39.19% | -33.90% | 114.29% |
PSIX Power Solutions International, Inc. | -47.57% | 92.07% | 1,351.22% | -31.67% | 0.00% | -9.09% | -58.23% | -14.59% | 23.33% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELH and PSIX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
CELH:
$6.93B
PSIX:
$690.59M
CELH:
$0.61
PSIX:
$4.43
CELH:
44.64
PSIX:
6.76
CELH:
0.05
PSIX:
0.07
CELH:
2.24
PSIX:
1.18
CELH:
17.68
PSIX:
3.72
CELH:
$2.97B
PSIX:
$586.96M
CELH:
$1.47B
PSIX:
$172.81M
CELH:
$274.27M
PSIX:
$102.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELH vs. PSIX — Risk / Return Rank
CELH
PSIX
CELH vs. PSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CELH | PSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.90 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.90 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -1.53 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CELH vs. PSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, smaller than the maximum PSIX drawdown of -98.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and PSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELH | PSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -98.55% | +20.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.19% | -74.18% | +15.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.86% | -74.18% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.86% | -84.37% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.86% | -92.96% | +15.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.78% | -74.12% | +2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.36% | -68.21% | +39.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.15% | 43.56% | -8.41% |
Volatility
CELH vs. PSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) is 15.26%, while Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) has a volatility of 18.26%. This indicates that CELH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELH | PSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 18.26% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.58% | 88.35% | -49.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.02% | 99.03% | -41.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.40% | 112.77% | -47.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.04% | 105.90% | -36.86% |
Dividends
CELH vs. PSIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELH nor PSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CELH vs. PSIX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Power Solutions International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CELH and PSIX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSIX has higher volatility (18.26%) compared to CELH (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELH dropped -77.86% vs PSIX's -98.55%.
PSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CELH and PSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer