PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEGX vs. TSLQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEGX vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEGX achieves a -57.70% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 1.43% return.


CEGX

1D
-4.90%
1M
-13.33%
6M
-53.77%
YTD
-57.70%
1Y
-50.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLQ

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.59%
6M
-2.69%
YTD
1.43%
1Y
-59.82%
3Y*
-63.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEGX vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CEGX
Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF
-57.70%13.33%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
1.43%-63.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CEGX and TSLQ is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEGX vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEGX
CEGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEGX vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEGXTSLQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.91

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.87

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.17

-1.09

-0.08

CEGX vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is comparable to the TSLQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEGX and TSLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEGX vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEGX drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEGX and TSLQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEGXTSLQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.88%

-98.73%

+25.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.88%

-69.32%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.59%

-98.49%

+28.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-68.10%

+31.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.33%

54.82%

-11.49%

Volatility

CEGX vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) is 20.97%, while Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 34.22%. This indicates that CEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEGXTSLQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.97%

34.22%

-13.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.18%

62.84%

+8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.60%

89.43%

+4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.42%

94.77%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.42%

94.77%

-1.35%

CEGX vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEGX vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

CEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CEGX
Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
10.41%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEGX and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLQ has higher volatility (34.22%) compared to CEGX (20.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEGX dropped -72.88% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.

On 1-year performance, CEGX leads with -50.84% vs -59.82% for TSLQ. On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, CEGX has been the lower-risk option at 20.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CEGX has performed better with a -50.84% return vs -59.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CEGX.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.41%, compared with 0.00% for CEGX.

CEGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CEGX and 1.17% for TSLQ.

CEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEGX and TSLQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer