CEGX vs. NBIG
CEGX (Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEGX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
CEGX vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEGX achieves a -51.98% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 487.61% return.
CEGX
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- -34.04%
- YTD
- -51.98%
- 6M
- -57.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG
- 1D
- 6.23%
- 1M
- 96.57%
- YTD
- 487.61%
- 6M
- 268.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEGX vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEGX Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF | -51.98% | -22.71% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 487.61% | -62.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEGX and NBIG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEGX vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEGX | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 1.38 | -1.94 |
Drawdowns
CEGX vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEGX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEGX and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEGX | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.35% | -75.83% | +9.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.48% | -3.94% | -61.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.35% | -42.82% | +9.47% |
Volatility
CEGX vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEGX | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.39% | 200.64% | -105.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.39% | 200.64% | -105.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.39% | 200.64% | -105.25% |
CEGX vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEGX vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEGX nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEGX and NBIG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CEGX.
CEGX and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CEGX and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for CEGX and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer