PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEGX vs. LULG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEGX vs. LULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEGX achieves a -51.98% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -68.58% return.


CEGX

1D
-2.04%
1M
-34.04%
YTD
-51.98%
6M
-57.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LULG

1D
-1.59%
1M
-10.00%
YTD
-68.58%
6M
-60.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEGX vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CEGX
Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF
-51.98%-9.60%
LULG
Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF
-68.58%47.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CEGX and LULG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEGX vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CEGX vs. LULG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEGXLULGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.55

-0.87

+0.32

Drawdowns

CEGX vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEGX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, smaller than the maximum LULG drawdown of -73.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEGX and LULG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEGXLULGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.35%

-73.18%

+6.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.48%

-70.90%

+5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.35%

-33.71%

+0.36%

Volatility

CEGX vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEGXLULGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.39%

85.42%

+9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.39%

85.42%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.39%

85.42%

+9.97%

CEGX vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEGX vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEGX nor LULG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CEGX and LULG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CEGX.

CEGX and LULG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CEGX and 0.75% for LULG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEGX and LULG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer