CEG vs. XOM
CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. CEG operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 3 years, CEG returned 39.97%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for XOM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CEG vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -28.84% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 27.80% return.
CEG
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- YTD
- -28.84%
- 6M
- -29.71%
- 1Y
- -15.67%
- 3Y*
- 39.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 27.80%
- 6M
- 32.61%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
CEG vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -28.84% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 64.11% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 27.80% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 42.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEG and XOM is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between CEG and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CEG:
$88.74B
XOM:
$634.77B
CEG:
$8.13
XOM:
$5.93
CEG:
30.85
XOM:
25.60
CEG:
0.54
XOM:
1.19
CEG:
3.27
XOM:
1.99
CEG:
2.65
XOM:
2.50
CEG:
$24.82B
XOM:
$326.01B
CEG:
$20.98B
XOM:
$83.11B
CEG:
$5.87B
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEG vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
CEG
XOM
CEG vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 3.21 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 8.97 | -9.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 2.07 | -2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.48 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
CEG vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -62.40% | +11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.77% | -15.69% | -23.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.70% | -18.92% | -31.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.69% | -10.90% | -26.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.58% | -10.20% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.77% | 5.61% | +13.16% |
Volatility
CEG vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a higher volatility of 15.62% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 9.20%. This indicates that CEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.62% | 9.20% | +6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.45% | 20.29% | +17.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.57% | 24.44% | +22.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.35% | 26.73% | +22.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.35% | 28.19% | +21.16% |
Dividends
CEG vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than XOM's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.65% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.69% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
CEG vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Energy Corp and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CEG vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
CEG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
CEG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported an operating income of 598.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
CEG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEG and XOM have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEG has higher volatility (15.62%) compared to XOM (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEG and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer