CEFZ vs. WAMA
CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. CEFZ is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEFZ charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CEFZ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | -1.00% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFZ and WAMA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFZ drawdown since its inception was -6.66%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -4.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFZ and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFZ | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -4.37% | -2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -3.20% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -1.13% | -0.08% |
Volatility
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFZ | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.46% | 14.24% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.46% | 14.24% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.46% | 14.24% | -3.78% |
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFZ has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
CEFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, while WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 8.40% | 4.17% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFZ and WAMA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.
CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: RiverNorth and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for CEFZ and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for CEFZ and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer