CEFZ vs. WAMA
CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. CEFZ is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEFZ charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CEFZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 6.39% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 7.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFZ and WAMA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFZ drawdown since its inception was -6.66%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -5.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFZ and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFZ | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -5.73% | -0.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.93% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -1.41% | +0.22% |
Volatility
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFZ | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 13.56% | -3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.32% | 13.56% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.32% | 13.56% | -3.24% |
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFZ has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFZ vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
CEFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than WAMA's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 9.10% | 4.17% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFZ and WAMA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.
CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 9.10%, compared with 0.42% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: RiverNorth and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for CEFZ and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for CEFZ and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer