PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFZ vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFZ vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CEFZ

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
3.47%
6M
3.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
-3.60%
1M
-8.93%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFZ vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CEFZ and BPH is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFZ vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CEFZ vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEFZ vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFZ drawdown since its inception was -6.66%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -12.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFZ and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFZBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-12.01%

+5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-12.01%

+9.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-3.60%

+2.39%

Volatility

CEFZ vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFZBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

26.17%

-15.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.43%

26.17%

-15.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.43%

26.17%

-15.74%

CEFZ vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFZ has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFZ vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

CEFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than BPH's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
0.55%0.00%
CEFZ
RiverNorth Active Income ETF
8.41%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEFZ and BPH have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.

CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.41%, compared with 0.55% for BPH.

CEFZ is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: RiverNorth and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for CEFZ and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFZ and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer