PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFS vs. DLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFS vs. DLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFS achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than DLY's -0.38% return.


CEFS

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.35%
YTD
13.75%
6M
15.64%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*

DLY

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
0.15%
1Y
-2.54%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFS vs. DLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
13.75%16.67%23.48%20.99%-7.08%17.86%2.80%
DLY
DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund
-0.38%0.63%16.29%25.48%-23.08%8.56%-3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFS and DLY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFS vs. DLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFS
CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DLY
DLY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFS vs. DLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEFSDLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.95

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

-0.29

+4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.26

-0.75

+18.01

CEFS vs. DLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the DLY Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFS and DLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEFSDLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

-0.32

+2.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.15

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.18

+0.61

Drawdowns

CEFS vs. DLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than DLY's maximum drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and DLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFSDLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.99%

-28.61%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-8.74%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.37%

-10.81%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-28.61%

+11.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-4.48%

+3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-7.82%

+4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

3.40%

-1.95%

Volatility

CEFS vs. DLY - Volatility Comparison

Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) at 1.93%. This indicates that CEFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFSDLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

1.93%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

6.85%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

8.09%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.08%

13.57%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

15.05%

+0.28%

CEFS vs. DLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFS has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DLY's 2.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFS vs. DLY - Dividend Comparison

CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, less than DLY's 10.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
7.10%7.84%8.79%9.20%11.32%10.73%8.61%8.10%10.43%5.02%
DLY
DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund
10.07%9.63%8.85%9.84%10.67%7.49%5.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEFS and DLY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEFS has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to DLY (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFS dropped -38.99% vs DLY's -28.61%.

CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFS and DLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer