CEFS vs. DLY
CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) and DLY (DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund) are both funds - CEFS is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while DLY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEFS returned 13.85%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for DLY. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEFS charges 1.29%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for DLY.
Performance
CEFS vs. DLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFS achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than DLY's -0.38% return.
CEFS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.85%
- 10Y*
- —
DLY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CEFS vs. DLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 13.75% | 16.67% | 23.48% | 20.99% | -7.08% | 17.86% | 2.80% |
DLY DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund | -0.38% | 0.63% | 16.29% | 25.48% | -23.08% | 8.56% | -3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFS and DLY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFS vs. DLY — Risk / Return Rank
CEFS
DLY
CEFS vs. DLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFS | DLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.95 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | -0.29 | +4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.26 | -0.75 | +18.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFS | DLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | -0.32 | +2.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.15 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.18 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
CEFS vs. DLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than DLY's maximum drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and DLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFS | DLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.99% | -28.61% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -8.74% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -10.81% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -28.61% | +11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -4.48% | +3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -7.82% | +4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 3.40% | -1.95% |
Volatility
CEFS vs. DLY - Volatility Comparison
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) at 1.93%. This indicates that CEFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFS | DLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 1.93% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 6.85% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 8.09% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 13.57% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 15.05% | +0.28% |
CEFS vs. DLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFS has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DLY's 2.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFS vs. DLY - Dividend Comparison
CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, less than DLY's 10.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 7.10% | 7.84% | 8.79% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 8.10% | 10.43% | 5.02% |
DLY DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund | 10.07% | 9.63% | 8.85% | 9.84% | 10.67% | 7.49% | 5.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFS and DLY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEFS has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to DLY (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFS dropped -38.99% vs DLY's -28.61%.
CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEFS and DLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer