CEFIX vs. GLLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX).
CEFIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Sep 30, 2019. GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.
Performance
CEFIX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEFIX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFIX Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund | -0.90% | 38.50% | 11.21% | 11.61% | -15.07% | 0.27% | 15.35% | 10.46% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 5.47% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 10.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFIX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 5.47% return.
CEFIX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -13.04%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- 1Y
- 31.55%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
GLLSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -13.34%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 48.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEFIX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEFIX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank
CEFIX
GLLSX
CEFIX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.46 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 3.02 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.46 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 3.15 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 13.47 | -4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.46 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.71 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFIX and GLLSX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEFIX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison
CEFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than GLLSX's 1.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFIX Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund | 3.16% | 3.13% | 1.76% | 3.20% | 5.51% | 4.57% | 0.13% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.78% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
CEFIX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFIX drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, smaller than the maximum GLLSX drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFIX and GLLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.73% | -32.59% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.87% | -14.39% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | -30.02% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.87% | -14.39% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -7.99% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.36% | -0.03% |
Volatility
CEFIX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX) is 8.61%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that CEFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEFIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 10.78% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.54% | 15.60% | -3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.61% | 19.51% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 17.21% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 17.34% | -0.23% |