PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFD vs. JBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CEFD vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CEFD vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CEFD
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN
-3.73%14.15%20.06%8.36%-28.65%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
-0.18%5.43%12.50%17.63%-5.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFD achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than JBBB's -0.18% return.


CEFD

1D
1.63%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-3.73%
6M
-3.27%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*

JBBB

1D
0.63%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
1.19%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CEFD vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CEFD vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFD
CEFD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CEFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFD vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEFDJBBBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

0.85

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.77

1.22

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

1.30

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.80

5.29

-2.49

CEFD vs. JBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the JBBB Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFD and JBBB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEFDJBBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.85

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.24

-0.82

Correlation

The correlation between CEFD and JBBB is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CEFD vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison

CEFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.83%, more than JBBB's 7.65% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
CEFD
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN
15.83%14.88%13.90%14.76%16.56%10.31%5.37%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.65%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CEFD vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFD drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than JBBB's maximum drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFD and JBBB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFDJBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-10.57%

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.13%

-3.45%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-1.39%

-5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-1.62%

-10.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

0.86%

+2.73%

Volatility

CEFD vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) at 2.05%. This indicates that CEFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CEFDJBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

2.05%

+6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

2.67%

+8.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.68%

5.07%

+15.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

5.33%

+12.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

5.33%

+12.08%