CEBT.DE vs. METL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CEBT.DE (iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEBT.DE is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Essential Metals Producers Index, while METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott. CEBT.DE is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBT.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.

Performance

CEBT.DE vs. METL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CEBT.DE is traded in EUR, while METL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the METL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEBT.DE achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 5.49% return.

CEBT.DE

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -11.82%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 8.25%
• 1Y: 90.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METL

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -9.38%
• YTD: 5.49%
• 6M: 4.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEBT.DE vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CEBT.DE iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc	6.75%	41.57%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	5.49%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CEBT.DE and METL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

CEBT.DE vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEBT.DE

CEBT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 79
CEBT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CEBT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
CEBT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CEBT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CEBT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

METL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEBT.DE vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEBT.DE	METL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.91	—	—

Drawdowns

CEBT.DE vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEBT.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.60%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBT.DE and METL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEBT.DE	METL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.60%	-24.98%	-14.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.85%	-18.60%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.36%	-7.55%	-3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CEBT.DE	METL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.21%	43.13%	-6.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.77%	43.13%	-12.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.77%	43.13%	-12.36%

CEBT.DE vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEBT.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEBT.DE vs. METL - Dividend Comparison

CEBT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.

Position	TTM	2025
CEBT.DE iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.97%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEBT.DE and METL in my portfolio?

CEBT.DE and METL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CEBT.DE or METL?

On fees, CEBT.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEBT.DE or METL?

CEBT.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

What is the main difference between CEBT.DE and METL?

CEBT.DE is categorized as Materials, while METL is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CEBT.DE and 0.89% for METL.