CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and V3PL.DE (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while V3PL.DE tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CEBL.DE returned 22.99%/yr vs 19.01%/yr for V3PL.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for V3PL.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CEBL.DE having a 31.90% return and V3PL.DE slightly lower at 31.53%.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
V3PL.DE
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 31.53%
- 6M
- 33.63%
- 1Y
- 50.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | 4.79% |
V3PL.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 31.53% | 16.39% | 7.41% | 10.31% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and V3PL.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and V3PL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
V3PL.DE
CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | V3PL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.52 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 4.50 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 17.17 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | V3PL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.79 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.24 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than V3PL.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and V3PL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | V3PL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -17.66% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -11.12% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -17.66% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -1.90% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -2.80% | -8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.92% | +0.21% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE) at 6.84%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3PL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | V3PL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 6.84% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 15.33% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 17.95% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 15.24% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 15.24% | +3.70% |
CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than V3PL.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. V3PL.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V3PL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V3PL.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 1.42% | 1.90% | 2.16% | 2.13% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and V3PL.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V3PL.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V3PL.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while V3PL.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.17% for V3PL.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and V3PL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer