CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and SXRS.DE (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEBL.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while SXRS.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEBL.DE returned 8.97%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for SXRS.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SXRS.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than SXRS.DE's 23.84% return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
SXRS.DE
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 23.84%
- 6M
- 22.88%
- 1Y
- 34.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -9.16% |
SXRS.DE iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 23.84% | 4.72% | 10.95% | -10.44% | 20.69% | 40.00% | -13.37% | 9.72% | -6.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and SXRS.DE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018 | 0.21 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and SXRS.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
SXRS.DE
CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | SXRS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 4.00 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 8.95 | +8.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | SXRS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 1.87 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than SXRS.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and SXRS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | SXRS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -27.64% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -8.75% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -16.03% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -27.56% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -4.99% | +2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -13.12% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.92% | -0.79% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE) at 5.76%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | SXRS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 5.76% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 16.67% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 18.76% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 17.13% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 15.85% | +3.09% |
CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRS.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor SXRS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and SXRS.DE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRS.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRS.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
CEBL.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SXRS.DE is Commodities. CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while SXRS.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.19% for SXRS.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and SXRS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer