CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and QDVS.DE (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEBL.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while QDVS.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEBL.DE returned 8.97%/yr vs 5.01%/yr for QDVS.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QDVS.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than QDVS.DE's 17.24% return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
QDVS.DE
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 17.96%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
QDVS.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF | 17.24% | 16.78% | 11.26% | -2.12% | -12.39% | 6.97% | 6.67% | 19.37% | -6.54% | 18.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and QDVS.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and QDVS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
QDVS.DE
CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.38 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 3.50 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 12.67 | +5.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.11 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.29 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.40 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVS.DE drawdown of -36.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and QDVS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -36.51% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -10.19% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -20.83% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -25.09% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -3.00% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -8.82% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.82% | +0.31% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) at 6.00%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 6.00% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 13.84% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 16.93% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 16.89% | +1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 18.68% | +0.26% |
CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor QDVS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, CEBL.DE and QDVS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QDVS.DE.
CEBL.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while QDVS.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while QDVS.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.25% for QDVS.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and QDVS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer