CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LYP6.DE (Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CEBL.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LYP6.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE returned 11.15%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for LYP6.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LYP6.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 30.06% return, which is significantly higher than LYP6.DE's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has outperformed LYP6.DE with an annualized return of 11.15%, while LYP6.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.02% annualized return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 33.12%
- 1Y
- 52.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
LYP6.DE
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 30.06% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
LYP6.DE Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc | 8.98% | 20.82% | 8.25% | 15.97% | -10.40% | 24.81% | -1.72% | 28.59% | -11.28% | 11.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and LYP6.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2013 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and LYP6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
LYP6.DE
CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEBL.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.26 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 1.94 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.30 | 7.50 | +7.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, roughly equal to the maximum LYP6.DE drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and LYP6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -35.51% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -9.45% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -16.26% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -20.71% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -35.51% | +2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.21% | -0.24% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -5.23% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 2.45% | +0.85% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.31%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 4.31% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | 10.85% | +6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 13.06% | +7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 14.43% | +4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 15.56% | +3.43% |
CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor LYP6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and LYP6.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
CEBL.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while LYP6.DE is Europe Equities. CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and LYP6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer