CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LKOR.DE (Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while LKOR.DE tracks the MSCI Korea 20/35. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE returned 11.02%/yr vs 16.69%/yr for LKOR.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LKOR.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly lower than LKOR.DE's 108.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has underperformed LKOR.DE with an annualized return of 11.02%, while LKOR.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.69% annualized return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
LKOR.DE
- 1D
- -5.01%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 108.92%
- 6M
- 122.90%
- 1Y
- 219.69%
- 3Y*
- 45.45%
- 5Y*
- 19.86%
- 10Y*
- 16.69%
CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
LKOR.DE Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc | 108.92% | 77.71% | -17.75% | 15.66% | -23.88% | -0.89% | 29.98% | 14.67% | -18.27% | 28.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and LKOR.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and LKOR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
LKOR.DE
CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | LKOR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.79 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 10.81 | -5.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 39.60 | -21.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | LKOR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 6.00 | -3.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.76 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.67 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.35 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum LKOR.DE drawdown of -68.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and LKOR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | LKOR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -68.29% | +33.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -21.02% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -30.36% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -41.19% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -41.81% | +8.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -5.31% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -17.52% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 5.75% | -2.62% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) is 8.24%, while Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE) has a volatility of 17.02%. This indicates that CEBL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKOR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | LKOR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 17.02% | -8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 33.05% | -16.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 37.93% | -18.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 25.70% | -7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 24.86% | -5.92% |
CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LKOR.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor LKOR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and LKOR.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LKOR.DE.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LKOR.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.45% for LKOR.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and LKOR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer