CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LGQK.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while LGQK.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE returned 11.02%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for LGQK.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGQK.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than LGQK.DE's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has underperformed LGQK.DE with an annualized return of 11.02%, while LGQK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
LGQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 9.03% | 6.49% | 12.16% | 1.67% | -1.07% | 12.33% | 56.18% | 16.88% | -9.04% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and LGQK.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and LGQK.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
LGQK.DE
CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.20 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 2.21 | +2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 6.30 | +11.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 1.14 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.47 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum LGQK.DE drawdown of -36.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and LGQK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -36.96% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -6.26% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -20.04% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -20.04% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -36.96% | +3.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -2.16% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -6.18% | -4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.20% | +0.93% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) at 3.20%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGQK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 3.20% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 9.32% | +7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 12.16% | +7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 14.67% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 25.08% | -6.14% |
CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LGQK.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 2.64% | 2.88% | 5.33% | 3.78% | 4.41% | 3.15% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and LGQK.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.12% for LGQK.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and LGQK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer