CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IQQX.DE (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while IQQX.DE tracks the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE returned 11.02%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for IQQX.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IQQX.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than IQQX.DE's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has outperformed IQQX.DE with an annualized return of 11.02%, while IQQX.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.29% annualized return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
IQQX.DE
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 13.33% | 14.78% | 12.48% | 8.98% | 2.81% | 11.77% | -18.85% | 16.80% | -11.26% | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and IQQX.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and IQQX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
IQQX.DE
CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.57 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 5.55 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 20.94 | -3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 3.10 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.77 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.40 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.21 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum IQQX.DE drawdown of -69.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and IQQX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -69.45% | +34.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -6.18% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -20.28% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -20.28% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -42.78% | +9.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -2.62% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -14.55% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.64% | +1.49% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) at 2.93%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 2.93% | +5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 8.61% | +7.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 11.06% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 13.01% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 15.75% | +3.19% |
CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQX.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 4.84% | 5.36% | 6.66% | 4.62% | 3.16% | 4.85% | 5.09% | 4.16% | 4.03% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and IQQX.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQX.DE.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.59% for IQQX.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and IQQX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer