CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IQQI.DE (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEBL.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while IQQI.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE returned 11.42%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for IQQI.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IQQI.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 33.53% return, which is significantly higher than IQQI.DE's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has outperformed IQQI.DE with an annualized return of 11.42%, while IQQI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 33.53%
- 6M
- 36.13%
- 1Y
- 53.09%
- 3Y*
- 24.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
IQQI.DE
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 20.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.26%
CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 33.53% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
IQQI.DE iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF | 14.89% | 0.56% | 14.53% | -3.18% | -0.38% | 26.94% | -10.82% | 27.73% | 2.23% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and IQQI.DE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CEBL.DE and IQQI.DE has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
IQQI.DE
CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEBL.DE | IQQI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 4.23 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.83 | 10.58 | +5.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum IQQI.DE drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and IQQI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | IQQI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -42.24% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -4.81% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -14.75% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -24.82% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -34.16% | +1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | 0.00% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -11.11% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 1.92% | +1.42% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) at 4.41%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | IQQI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 4.41% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.45% | 8.95% | +9.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 10.83% | +10.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 12.77% | +6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 14.25% | +4.85% |
CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQI.DE iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF | 2.01% | 2.30% | 2.29% | 2.42% | 2.13% | 1.85% | 2.25% | 2.05% | 2.30% | 2.76% | 2.63% | 3.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and IQQI.DE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQI.DE.
CEBL.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IQQI.DE is Global Equities. CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while IQQI.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.65% for IQQI.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and IQQI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer