CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and FVSJ.DE (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while FVSJ.DE tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEBL.DE returned 8.97%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for FVSJ.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FVSJ.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly lower than FVSJ.DE's 45.45% return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
FVSJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 45.45%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- 72.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- —
CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -8.49% |
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 45.45% | 15.41% | 14.01% | 8.23% | -7.58% | 13.71% | -3.67% | 13.83% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and FVSJ.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and FVSJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
FVSJ.DE
CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.64 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 6.17 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 23.31 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 3.60 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.94 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than FVSJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and FVSJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -26.95% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -11.93% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -21.76% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -21.76% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -2.76% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -5.16% | -5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.16% | -0.03% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) is 8.24%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that CEBL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVSJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 9.05% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 17.69% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 20.43% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 15.44% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 17.16% | +1.78% |
CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FVSJ.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor FVSJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CEBL.DE and FVSJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FVSJ.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVSJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while FVSJ.DE tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.14% for FVSJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and FVSJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer