CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and FLXT.DE (Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while FLXT.DE tracks the FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CEBL.DE returned 22.99%/yr vs 41.09%/yr for FLXT.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXT.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly lower than FLXT.DE's 69.39% return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
FLXT.DE
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 13.04%
- YTD
- 69.39%
- 6M
- 72.01%
- 1Y
- 113.39%
- 3Y*
- 41.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -11.45% |
FLXT.DE Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation | 69.39% | 19.89% | 30.42% | 25.56% | -22.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and FLXT.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and FLXT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
FLXT.DE
CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.78 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 12.64 | -7.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 38.64 | -20.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 4.92 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.15 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than FLXT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and FLXT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -31.16% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -9.05% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -31.16% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -1.86% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -8.18% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.97% | +0.16% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) is 8.24%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that CEBL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 9.61% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 18.65% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 23.26% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 21.86% | -3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 21.86% | -2.92% |
CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor FLXT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and FLXT.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXT.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXT.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while FLXT.DE tracks FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.19% for FLXT.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and FLXT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer