CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and DBX8.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while DBX8.DE tracks the MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE returned 11.02%/yr vs 16.74%/yr for DBX8.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBX8.DE.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly lower than DBX8.DE's 109.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has underperformed DBX8.DE with an annualized return of 11.02%, while DBX8.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.74% annualized return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 34.52%
- 1Y
- 55.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
DBX8.DE
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- 16.35%
- YTD
- 109.21%
- 6M
- 127.53%
- 1Y
- 227.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.74%
CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
DBX8.DE Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 109.21% | 77.39% | -18.45% | 15.93% | -23.95% | -0.54% | 30.13% | 14.92% | -18.04% | 28.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and DBX8.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.77 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and DBX8.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
DBX8.DE
CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.75 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 10.67 | -5.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 32.63 | -14.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 5.17 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.72 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.66 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.31 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum DBX8.DE drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and DBX8.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -68.01% | +32.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -21.19% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -30.70% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -41.29% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -41.89% | +8.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -5.82% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -17.55% | +6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 6.94% | -3.81% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) is 8.24%, while Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a volatility of 17.08%. This indicates that CEBL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBX8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 17.08% | -8.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 33.48% | -17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 43.73% | -24.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 27.53% | -9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 26.03% | -7.09% |
CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBX8.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor DBX8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and DBX8.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBX8.DE.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while DBX8.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEBL.DE and 0.45% for DBX8.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and DBX8.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer