CEBL.DE vs. ABEA.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while ABEA.DE (Alphabet Inc Class A) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE returned 11.48%/yr vs 26.34%/yr for ABEA.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 33.88% return, which is significantly higher than ABEA.DE's 20.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has underperformed ABEA.DE with an annualized return of 11.48%, while ABEA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 26.34% annualized return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 33.88%
- 6M
- 38.12%
- 1Y
- 56.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
ABEA.DE
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- 1Y
- 111.19%
- 3Y*
- 41.67%
- 5Y*
- 26.42%
- 10Y*
- 26.34%
CEBL.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 33.88% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
ABEA.DE Alphabet Inc Class A | 20.52% | 46.64% | 44.40% | 54.77% | -36.91% | 80.66% | 18.64% | 31.56% | 4.52% | 16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and ABEA.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and ABEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. ABEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
ABEA.DE
CEBL.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEBL.DE | ABEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.62 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | 6.39 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.18 | 21.06 | -3.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum ABEA.DE drawdown of -59.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and ABEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | ABEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -59.53% | +24.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -17.32% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -33.71% | +13.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -38.63% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -38.63% | +5.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -7.42% | +6.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -12.82% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 5.26% | -1.96% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) is 7.97%, while Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that CEBL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | ABEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 9.31% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 18.73% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.59% | 28.00% | -7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 29.74% | -11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 27.77% | -8.76% |
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ABEA.DE Alphabet Inc Class A | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.30% |
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and ABEA.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and ABEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer