PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CE71.L vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CE71.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE71.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CE71.L is traded in GBp, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE71.L achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CE71.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 1.34%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.51% annualized return.


CE71.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-1.45%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
1.34%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
6.29%
YTD
11.74%
6M
10.77%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
16.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CE71.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CE71.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.29%7.79%-2.51%3.91%-7.07%-8.68%8.08%-2.38%0.86%6.21%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.32%9.43%27.16%20.01%-8.44%30.01%14.85%26.37%1.16%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CE71.L and VOO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2014

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CE71.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE71.L
CE71.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CE71.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE71.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE71.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CE71.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE71.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CE71.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE71.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE71.LVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.49

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

3.86

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

14.79

-13.16

CE71.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE71.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE71.L and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CE71.LVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.59

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.97

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.92

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.95

-0.76

Drawdowns

CE71.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE71.L drawdown since its inception was -19.41%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE71.L and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CE71.LVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.41%

-26.09%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-7.66%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.12%

-21.93%

+16.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.10%

-21.93%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.41%

-26.09%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.97%

0.00%

-9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-3.30%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.00%

-0.24%

Volatility

CE71.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE71.L) is 1.52%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that CE71.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CE71.LVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

2.53%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.66%

8.12%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.83%

11.45%

-6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

15.76%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

18.10%

-8.85%

CE71.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CE71.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CE71.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CE71.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CE71.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CE71.L and VOO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE71.L.

CE71.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. CE71.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CE71.L and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CE71.L and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer