PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (CE2D.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CE2D.L is traded in GBp, while ALAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ALAU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE2D.L achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than ALAU.L's 11.14% return.


CE2D.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.34%
YTD
6.08%
6M
8.48%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*

ALAU.L

1D
-1.91%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
11.14%
6M
9.85%
1Y
40.05%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CE2D.L
Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
6.08%25.78%3.75%14.43%-4.94%18.18%
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America
11.14%43.92%-25.14%23.53%25.23%-1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CE2D.L and ALAU.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021

0.25

Over the past year, CE2D.L and ALAU.L have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CE2D.L
ALAU.L

Financial Services

23.5%
30.3%

Industrials

20.1%
10.8%

Healthcare

13.3%
1.4%

Technology

8.7%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
1.6%

Energy

5.4%
11.7%

Basic Materials

5.0%
19.7%

Utilities

4.8%
8.5%

Communication Services

3.7%
4.0%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.6%

Financial Services

CE2D.L
23.5%
ALAU.L
30.3%

Industrials

CE2D.L
20.1%
ALAU.L
10.8%

Healthcare

CE2D.L
13.3%
ALAU.L
1.4%

Technology

CE2D.L
8.7%
ALAU.L
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

CE2D.L
8.3%
ALAU.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CE2D.L
6.4%
ALAU.L
1.6%

Energy

CE2D.L
5.4%
ALAU.L
11.7%

Basic Materials

CE2D.L
5.0%
ALAU.L
19.7%

Utilities

CE2D.L
4.8%
ALAU.L
8.5%

Communication Services

CE2D.L
3.7%
ALAU.L
4.0%

Real Estate

CE2D.L
0.8%
ALAU.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE2D.L
CE2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CE2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CE2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAU.L
ALAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (CE2D.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE2D.LALAU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.82

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

11.11

-4.64

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE2D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE2D.L and ALAU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CE2D.LALAU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.13

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.73

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.59

+0.55

Drawdowns

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE2D.L drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum ALAU.L drawdown of -48.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE2D.L and ALAU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CE2D.LALAU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-48.77%

+33.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-10.43%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-25.61%

+12.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-25.61%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-10.43%

+8.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-10.81%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.60%

-0.63%

Volatility

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (CE2D.L) is 4.10%, while Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that CE2D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CE2D.LALAU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

5.08%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

15.97%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

18.68%

-6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

27.85%

-10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

42.57%

-24.95%

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CE2D.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAU.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CE2D.L vs. ALAU.L - Dividend Comparison

CE2D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while ALAU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CE2D.L
Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
2.38%2.52%2.79%2.74%3.00%2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


CE2D.L and ALAU.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE2D.L.

CE2D.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ALAU.L is Latin America Equities. CE2D.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ALAU.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CE2D.L and 0.10% for ALAU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CE2D.L and ALAU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer