CDX vs. HYLB
CDX (Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. CDX is actively managed, while HYLB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDX returned 7.17%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for HYLB. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.
Performance
CDX vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.53% return.
CDX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- -1.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLB
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.87%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- —
CDX vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | -2.44% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 12.74% | -8.12% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.53% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDX and HYLB is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CDX and HYLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDX vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
CDX
HYLB
CDX vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDX | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.37 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.04 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 13.06 | -14.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDX | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 1.86 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
CDX vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDX drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDX and HYLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDX | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -22.91% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -2.27% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.88% | -4.51% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | -0.19% | -7.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -2.43% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 0.53% | +1.24% |
Volatility
CDX vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) at 1.20%. This indicates that CDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDX | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.20% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.72% | 2.93% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.69% | 3.70% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 7.47% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 8.18% | +2.92% |
CDX vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CDX vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
CDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than HYLB's 6.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | 8.37% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.49% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDX and HYLB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDX has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to HYLB (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDX dropped -13.24% vs HYLB's -22.91%.
On 3-year performance, HYLB leads with 8.72% vs 7.17% for CDX. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYLB has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 8.72% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for CDX.
CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 6.49% for HYLB.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for CDX and 0.15% for HYLB.
HYLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDX and HYLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer