CDX vs. BCI
CDX (Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CDX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDX returned 7.17%/yr vs 15.96%/yr for BCI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.
Performance
CDX vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 26.68% return.
CDX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- -1.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- 26.68%
- 6M
- 25.55%
- 1Y
- 38.68%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CDX vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | -2.44% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 12.74% | -8.12% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 26.68% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDX and BCI is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022 | 0.03 |
The correlation between CDX and BCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CDX vs. BCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDX
BCI
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CDX
BCI
-
Industrials
CDX
BCI
-
Healthcare
CDX
BCI
-
Financial Services
CDX
BCI
Consumer Cyclical
CDX
BCI
-
Energy
CDX
BCI
-
Real Estate
CDX
BCI
-
Communication Services
CDX
BCI
-
Consumer Defensive
CDX
BCI
-
Basic Materials
CDX
BCI
-
Utilities
CDX
BCI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDX vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
CDX
BCI
CDX vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDX | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.41 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 5.10 | -5.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 13.14 | -14.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDX | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 2.30 | -2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.48 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
CDX vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDX drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDX and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDX | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -32.69% | +19.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -7.61% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.88% | -11.38% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | -4.52% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -12.00% | +7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 2.95% | -1.18% |
Volatility
CDX vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) is 1.61%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that CDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDX | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 5.16% | -3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.72% | 14.80% | -10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.69% | 16.92% | -11.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 16.82% | -5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 15.65% | -4.55% |
CDX vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CDX vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
CDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, less than BCI's 13.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.01% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | 8.37% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDX and BCI have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCI has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to CDX (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDX dropped -13.24% vs BCI's -32.69%.
On 3-year performance, BCI leads with 15.96% vs 7.17% for CDX. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BCI has performed better with a 15.96% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for CDX.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 8.37% for CDX.
CDX is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for CDX and 0.25% for BCI.
BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDX and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer