PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDSRX vs. SDMZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDSRX vs. SDMZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDSRX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than SDMZX's 0.81% return.


CDSRX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.09%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*

SDMZX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.33%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
3.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDSRX vs. SDMZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CDSRX
Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6
0.50%6.35%5.74%6.87%-5.07%1.20%4.82%4.87%
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
0.81%6.18%5.64%6.25%-4.82%-0.19%3.97%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CDSRX and SDMZX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019

0.78

The correlation between CDSRX and SDMZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDSRX vs. SDMZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDSRX
CDSRX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CDSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CDSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SDMZX
SDMZX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SDMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SDMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDSRX vs. SDMZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDSRXSDMZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.65

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

9.31

+1.50

CDSRX vs. SDMZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the SDMZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDSRX and SDMZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDSRX vs. SDMZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDSRX drawdown since its inception was -9.96%, roughly equal to the maximum SDMZX drawdown of -9.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDSRX and SDMZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDSRXSDMZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-9.76%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.56%

-1.77%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.56%

-1.77%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.91%

-8.51%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-1.77%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-0.99%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.50%

-0.10%

Volatility

CDSRX vs. SDMZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) is 0.64%, while PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that CDSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDMZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDSRXSDMZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

2.49%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

2.83%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

3.16%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

2.57%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.66%

2.58%

+0.08%

CDSRX vs. SDMZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDSRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SDMZX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDSRX vs. SDMZX - Dividend Comparison

CDSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, which matches SDMZX's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDSRX
Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6
4.68%4.55%4.98%3.52%2.21%2.56%2.88%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
4.71%4.62%4.57%3.36%4.70%2.76%3.10%6.18%3.47%2.64%2.76%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDSRX and SDMZX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDMZX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to CDSRX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDSRX dropped -9.96% vs SDMZX's -9.76%.

CDSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDSRX and SDMZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer