CDSRX vs. LCCMX
CDSRX (Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6) and LCCMX (Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CDSRX returned 2.85%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for LCCMX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDSRX charges 0.45%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for LCCMX.
Performance
CDSRX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDSRX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than LCCMX's 3.89% return.
CDSRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- —
LCCMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
CDSRX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDSRX Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 | 0.82% | 6.35% | 5.74% | 6.87% | -5.07% | 1.20% | 4.82% | 4.87% |
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | 3.89% | 9.73% | 18.51% | 13.73% | -13.30% | 1.30% | 7.52% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDSRX and LCCMX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CDSRX and LCCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDSRX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank
CDSRX
LCCMX
CDSRX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDSRX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | 2.46 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.29 | 5.36 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 2.01 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.96 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.37 | 10.42 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDSRX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.46 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 1.06 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.81 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
CDSRX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDSRX drawdown since its inception was -9.96%, smaller than the maximum LCCMX drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDSRX and LCCMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDSRX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -24.57% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.56% | -3.76% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.56% | -3.76% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.91% | -19.20% | +11.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.80% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 1.06% | -0.67% |
Volatility
CDSRX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) have volatilities of 0.67% and 0.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDSRX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.68% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.54% | 4.06% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10% | 4.53% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 5.84% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 6.35% | -3.69% |
CDSRX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDSRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDSRX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison
CDSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than LCCMX's 8.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDSRX Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 | 4.67% | 4.55% | 4.98% | 3.52% | 2.21% | 2.56% | 2.88% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | 8.53% | 8.93% | 10.39% | 8.55% | 5.68% | 2.11% | 2.11% | 2.98% | 2.89% | 2.10% | 2.01% | 2.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDSRX and LCCMX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCCMX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to CDSRX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDSRX dropped -9.96% vs LCCMX's -24.57%.
LCCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDSRX and LCCMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer