CDOT.DE vs. BTRN
CDOT.DE (CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. CDOT.DE is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, CDOT.DE returned -73.47% vs -18.67% for BTRN. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDOT.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
CDOT.DE vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CDOT.DE is traded in EUR, while BTRN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTRN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDOT.DE achieves a -40.09% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -8.16% return.
CDOT.DE
- 1D
- -4.83%
- 1M
- -15.78%
- YTD
- -40.09%
- 6M
- -53.26%
- 1Y
- -73.47%
- 3Y*
- -39.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -12.96%
- YTD
- -8.16%
- 6M
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- -18.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDOT.DE vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CDOT.DE CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP | -40.09% | -75.15% | -21.76% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -8.16% | -7.56% | 10.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDOT.DE and BTRN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDOT.DE vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
CDOT.DE
BTRN
CDOT.DE vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDOT.DE | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.85 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.75 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -1.26 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDOT.DE | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | -0.92 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -0.09 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
CDOT.DE vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDOT.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -37.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOT.DE and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDOT.DE | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -37.91% | -56.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.82% | -24.90% | -50.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.66% | -24.90% | -69.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.87% | -15.12% | -55.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.28% | 14.90% | +34.38% |
Volatility
CDOT.DE vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 6.87%. This indicates that CDOT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDOT.DE | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.86% | 6.87% | +9.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.99% | 11.35% | +40.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.57% | 20.45% | +52.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.58% | 31.77% | +45.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.58% | 31.77% | +45.81% |
CDOT.DE vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDOT.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDOT.DE vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
CDOT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
CDOT.DE CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDOT.DE and BTRN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CDOT.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CDOT.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CDOT.DE and 0.95% for BTRN.
Find the right allocation for CDOT.DE and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer