CDOFX vs. LMSIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CDOFX (Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund) and LMSIX (Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CDOFX returned 8.68%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for LMSIX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CDOFX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for LMSIX.

Performance

CDOFX vs. LMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDOFX achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than LMSIX's 16.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CDOFX has underperformed LMSIX with an annualized return of 8.68%, while LMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.23% annualized return.

CDOFX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 6M: 9.92%
• 1Y: 17.36%
• 3Y*: 10.17%
• 5Y*: 4.23%
• 10Y*: 8.68%

LMSIX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 16.18%
• 6M: 15.04%
• 1Y: 41.69%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDOFX vs. LMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDOFX Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund	9.96%	0.44%	10.43%	14.63%	-14.07%	22.03%	3.51%	22.04%	-7.60%	13.94%
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	16.18%	20.19%	9.90%	18.80%	-15.16%	29.12%	11.29%	20.75%	-15.61%	8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CDOFX and LMSIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.93

The correlation between CDOFX and LMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CDOFX vs. LMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDOFX

CDOFX Risk / Return Rank: 15
CDOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CDOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CDOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CDOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CDOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

LMSIX

LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDOFX vs. LMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDOFX	LMSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	2.39	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	3.31	-1.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.41	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	4.76	-3.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.74	16.58	-11.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDOFX vs. LMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the LMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDOFX and LMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDOFX	LMSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	2.39	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.43	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.48	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.34	+0.17

Drawdowns

CDOFX vs. LMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDOFX drawdown since its inception was -39.92%, smaller than the maximum LMSIX drawdown of -61.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOFX and LMSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDOFX	LMSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.92%	-61.16%	+21.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.95%	-9.22%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.11%	-26.80%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.11%	-27.66%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.92%	-50.26%	+10.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.45%	0.00%	-3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-10.89%	+4.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	2.64%	+0.84%

Volatility

CDOFX vs. LMSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) is 4.37%, while Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that CDOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDOFX	LMSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	5.31%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.29%	12.90%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.88%	18.36%	-1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.18%	21.95%	-2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.60%	23.50%	-2.90%

CDOFX vs. LMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDOFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than LMSIX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDOFX vs. LMSIX - Dividend Comparison

CDOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than LMSIX's 5.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDOFX Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund	3.22%	3.54%	4.09%	1.14%	4.17%	7.23%	1.99%	5.68%	7.70%	5.58%	1.31%	7.46%
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	5.46%	6.35%	4.05%	3.70%	5.18%	21.64%	3.60%	1.48%	11.17%	8.85%	4.79%	7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDOFX and LMSIX in my portfolio?

CDOFX and LMSIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDOFX or LMSIX?

LMSIX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to CDOFX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDOFX dropped -39.92% vs LMSIX's -61.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.