CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) and Burberry Group plc (BRBY.L).
Performance
CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDI.PA Christian Dior SE | -25.00% | 1.06% | -12.75% | 5.60% | -4.93% | 62.39% | 0.65% | 47.18% | 11.38% | 54.64% |
BRBY.L Burberry Group plc | -13.91% | 22.73% | -24.08% | -26.35% | 9.04% | 11.19% | -23.25% | 38.28% | -2.36% | 17.75% |
Different Trading Currencies
CDI.PA is traded in EUR, while BRBY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BRBY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDI.PA achieves a -25.00% return, which is significantly lower than BRBY.L's -13.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CDI.PA has outperformed BRBY.L with an annualized return of 13.37%, while BRBY.L has yielded a comparatively lower -0.38% annualized return.
CDI.PA
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -25.00%
- 6M
- -12.48%
- 1Y
- -13.56%
- 3Y*
- -16.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
BRBY.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- -13.91%
- 6M
- -9.31%
- 1Y
- 35.20%
- 3Y*
- -22.32%
- 5Y*
- -8.74%
- 10Y*
- -0.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L — Risk / Return Rank
CDI.PA
BRBY.L
CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) and Burberry Group plc (BRBY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDI.PA | BRBY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | 0.79 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | 1.38 | -1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.16 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 1.98 | -2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 4.21 | -4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDI.PA | BRBY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 0.79 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | -0.23 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | -0.01 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.10 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between CDI.PA and BRBY.L is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L - Dividend Comparison
CDI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while BRBY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDI.PA Christian Dior SE | 3.03% | 2.28% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 0.96% | 1.01% | 7.27% | 1.62% | 0.99% | 1.78% | 2.04% |
BRBY.L Burberry Group plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.36% | 4.44% | 2.56% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 2.38% | 2.20% | 2.49% | 2.99% |
Drawdowns
CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDI.PA drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, smaller than the maximum BRBY.L drawdown of -81.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDI.PA and BRBY.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDI.PA | BRBY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.37% | -76.95% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -26.76% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.27% | -76.61% | +27.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.27% | -76.61% | +27.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.09% | -55.30% | +10.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.77% | -19.42% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.08% | 12.18% | -1.10% |
Volatility
CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) is 6.38%, while Burberry Group plc (BRBY.L) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that CDI.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRBY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CDI.PA | BRBY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 10.37% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.09% | 26.49% | -4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.08% | 44.14% | -12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.28% | 38.58% | -9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.00% | 36.28% | -8.28% |
Financials
CDI.PA vs. BRBY.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Christian Dior SE and Burberry Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities