PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CDI.PA vs. AMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CDI.PAAMT
YTD Return6.16%-12.62%
1Y Return-9.10%-0.92%
3Y Return (Ann)7.64%-6.30%
5Y Return (Ann)12.59%0.86%
10Y Return (Ann)20.48%10.11%
Sharpe Ratio-0.33-0.13
Daily Std Dev25.52%25.42%
Max Drawdown-69.37%-98.70%
Current Drawdown-11.85%-33.42%

Fundamentals


CDI.PAAMT
Market Cap€133.50B$86.15B
EPS€34.93$4.43
PE Ratio21.1941.65
PEG Ratio0.001.40
Revenue (TTM)€86.15B$11.21B
Gross Profit (TTM)€54.20B$7.45B
EBITDA (TTM)€25.14B$7.00B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CDI.PA and AMT is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CDI.PA vs. AMT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CDI.PA achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's -12.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CDI.PA has outperformed AMT with an annualized return of 20.48%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5,265.94%
1,288.06%
CDI.PA
AMT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Christian Dior SE

American Tower Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CDI.PA vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDI.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.22
AMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMT, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.28

CDI.PA vs. AMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDI.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the AMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CDI.PA and AMT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.40December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.13
0.12
CDI.PA
AMT

Dividends

CDI.PA vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison

CDI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than AMT's 3.48% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CDI.PA
Christian Dior SE
1.75%1.77%1.76%0.96%1.01%1.36%1.62%0.99%1.78%2.04%1.93%2.11%
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.48%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%1.38%

Drawdowns

CDI.PA vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDI.PA drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDI.PA and AMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.61%
-33.42%
CDI.PA
AMT

Volatility

CDI.PA vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) is 5.63%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that CDI.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.63%
7.11%
CDI.PA
AMT

Financials

CDI.PA vs. AMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Christian Dior SE and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. CDI.PA values in EUR, AMT values in USD