PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDI.PA vs. LVMUY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CDI.PA is traded in EUR, while LVMUY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LVMUY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CDI.PA having a -24.54% return and LVMUY slightly higher at -24.52%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CDI.PA having a 14.23% annualized return and LVMUY not far ahead at 14.75%.


CDI.PA

1D
1.80%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
-24.54%
6M
-23.44%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
-15.20%
5Y*
-6.10%
10Y*
14.23%

LVMUY

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-24.52%
6M
-22.79%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
-14.43%
5Y*
-4.21%
10Y*
14.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDI.PA
Christian Dior SE
-24.54%1.06%-12.75%5.60%-4.93%62.39%0.65%47.18%11.38%54.64%
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-24.52%4.10%-12.59%10.47%-5.32%44.16%25.68%65.97%6.38%39.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CDI.PA and LVMUY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.67

The correlation between CDI.PA and LVMUY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDI.PA
CDI.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CDI.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDI.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDI.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CDI.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDI.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

LVMUY
LVMUY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LVMUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVMUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVMUY Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LVMUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVMUY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDI.PALVMUYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.05

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.14

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

0.28

-0.13

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDI.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the LVMUY Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDI.PA and LVMUY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDI.PALVMUYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

0.14

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.14

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.50

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.30

+0.17

Drawdowns

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDI.PA drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, smaller than the maximum LVMUY drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDI.PA and LVMUY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDI.PALVMUYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.37%

-77.57%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.68%

-30.99%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.97%

-48.72%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.27%

-49.72%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.27%

-49.72%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.74%

-43.80%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-18.11%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.36%

15.43%

-1.07%

Volatility

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) is 7.42%, while LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that CDI.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVMUY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDI.PALVMUYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

8.62%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.88%

21.59%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.71%

30.92%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.50%

30.19%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.24%

29.40%

-1.16%

Dividends

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY - Dividend Comparison

CDI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than LVMUY's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDI.PA
Christian Dior SE
3.24%2.28%2.15%1.77%1.76%0.96%1.01%7.27%1.62%0.99%1.78%2.04%
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.74%1.92%2.14%1.65%1.78%0.99%1.64%1.49%2.21%2.67%4.16%12.95%

Financials

CDI.PA vs. LVMUY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Christian Dior SE and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CDI.PA values in EUR, LVMUY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CDI.PA and LVMUY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDI.PA and LVMUY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer