PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CDI.PA vs. MC.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CDI.PAMC.PA
YTD Return-19.61%-17.50%
1Y Return-14.42%-11.22%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.95%-4.47%
5Y Return (Ann)5.73%9.69%
10Y Return (Ann)17.43%18.78%
Sharpe Ratio-0.65-0.54
Sortino Ratio-0.91-0.70
Omega Ratio0.890.92
Calmar Ratio-0.52-0.46
Martin Ratio-1.05-0.89
Ulcer Index16.84%16.95%
Daily Std Dev27.04%28.09%
Max Drawdown-69.37%-70.25%
Current Drawdown-33.25%-31.84%

Fundamentals


CDI.PAMC.PA
Market Cap€105.02B€309.50B
EPS€32.20€27.95
PE Ratio17.4821.45
PEG Ratio0.005.16
Total Revenue (TTM)€85.59B€85.59B
Gross Profit (TTM)€58.65B€58.65B
EBITDA (TTM)€26.35B€24.43B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CDI.PA and MC.PA is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CDI.PA vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CDI.PA achieves a -19.61% return, which is significantly lower than MC.PA's -17.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CDI.PA has underperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 17.43%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 18.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.34%
-24.33%
CDI.PA
MC.PA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CDI.PA vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDI.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.90
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -1.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.12
MC.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.99, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.99

CDI.PA vs. MC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDI.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is comparable to the MC.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDI.PA and MC.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.20JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.66
-0.56
CDI.PA
MC.PA

Dividends

CDI.PA vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison

CDI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than MC.PA's 2.17% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CDI.PA
Christian Dior SE
2.31%1.77%1.76%0.96%1.01%1.36%1.62%0.99%1.78%2.04%1.93%2.11%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.17%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%3.58%2.26%

Drawdowns

CDI.PA vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDI.PA drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, roughly equal to the maximum MC.PA drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDI.PA and MC.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-35.54%
-35.11%
CDI.PA
MC.PA

Volatility

CDI.PA vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison

Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) have volatilities of 9.27% and 9.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.27%
9.23%
CDI.PA
MC.PA

Financials

CDI.PA vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Christian Dior SE and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in EUR except per share items