CDGIX vs. MUHLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CDGIX (Crawford Large Cap Dividend Fund) and MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CDGIX returned 9.19%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for MUHLX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CDGIX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MUHLX.

Performance

CDGIX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Large Cap Dividend Fund (CDGIX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDGIX achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CDGIX has underperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 9.19%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.

CDGIX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: -0.77%
• 1Y: 3.35%
• 3Y*: 9.38%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

MUHLX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 6M: 11.87%
• 1Y: 23.73%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDGIX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDGIX Crawford Large Cap Dividend Fund	-1.85%	12.21%	11.31%	7.23%	-7.42%	21.90%	7.33%	28.61%	-3.97%	14.10%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	11.53%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CDGIX and MUHLX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2004	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between CDGIX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CDGIX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDGIX

CDGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5
CDGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CDGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CDGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CDGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CDGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 37
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDGIX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Large Cap Dividend Fund (CDGIX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDGIX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	1.76	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	2.40	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.31	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.40	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.26	9.10	-7.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDGIX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDGIX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDGIX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	1.76	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.73	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.63	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.52	-0.11

Drawdowns

CDGIX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDGIX drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDGIX and MUHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDGIX	MUHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.46%	-62.05%	+13.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.70%	-10.23%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.12%	-18.63%	+5.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.11%	-18.63%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.30%	-40.85%	+6.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.81%	-3.55%	-1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.71%	-10.77%	+4.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	2.69%	+0.20%

Volatility

CDGIX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crawford Large Cap Dividend Fund (CDGIX) is 2.16%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that CDGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDGIX	MUHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.16%	3.17%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.26%	10.95%	-3.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.66%	13.98%	-4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.70%	14.62%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.39%	17.05%	-0.66%

CDGIX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDGIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDGIX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

CDGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than MUHLX's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDGIX Crawford Large Cap Dividend Fund	6.04%	5.93%	6.81%	4.50%	3.25%	3.65%	6.97%	1.51%	3.89%	7.15%	13.62%	20.00%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	2.99%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDGIX and MUHLX in my portfolio?

CDGIX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDGIX or MUHLX?

MUHLX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to CDGIX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDGIX dropped -48.46% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUHLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.