PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDEI vs. SIXA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDEI vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 14.36% return.


CDEI

1D
1.06%
1M
1.19%
6M
11.52%
YTD
12.39%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
19.13%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.30%

SIXA

1D
0.32%
1M
0.88%
6M
8.31%
YTD
14.36%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$670.28K$332.00K$158.81K
$1.52M$1.58M$834.78K

CDEI vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
12.39%16.60%18.67%22.82%
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
14.36%15.52%22.70%9.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and SIXA is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.71

The correlation between CDEI and SIXA shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CDEI vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDEI
SIXA

Technology

42.5%
17.0%

Financial Services

15.7%
12.8%

Healthcare

12.2%
15.0%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.4%

Industrials

7.4%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
23.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
5.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
3.8%

Utilities

1.6%
2.7%

Energy

0.4%
4.9%

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Technology

CDEI
42.5%
SIXA
17.0%

Financial Services

CDEI
15.7%
SIXA
12.8%

Healthcare

CDEI
12.2%
SIXA
15.0%

Communication Services

CDEI
10.4%
SIXA
10.4%

Industrials

CDEI
7.4%
SIXA
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

CDEI
3.9%
SIXA
23.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CDEI
3.4%
SIXA
5.1%

Real Estate

CDEI
2.2%
SIXA
3.8%

Utilities

CDEI
1.6%
SIXA
2.7%

Energy

CDEI
0.4%
SIXA
4.9%

Basic Materials

CDEI
0.2%
SIXA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDEI vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDEI
CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXA
SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDEI vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDEISIXADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.52

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

13.39

-2.37

CDEI vs. SIXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SIXA Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and SIXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than SIXA's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and SIXA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEISIXADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-18.38%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-5.59%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-11.22%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-2.93%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.47%

+0.85%

Volatility

CDEI vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.69%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDEISIXADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

2.69%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

6.96%

+3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

9.02%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

12.77%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

13.26%

+1.81%

CDEI vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDEI vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SIXA's 1.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
0.97%1.05%1.22%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
1.98%2.31%1.62%2.12%2.23%1.63%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDEI and SIXA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDEI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to SIXA (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs SIXA's -18.38%.

On 3-year performance, SIXA leads with 19.93% vs 19.13% for CDEI. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 19.93% return vs 19.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.97% for CDEI.

They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.86% for SIXA.

SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDEI and SIXA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer