CDEI vs. SIXA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CDEI (Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CDEI is passively managed, while SIXA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDEI returned 17.99%/yr vs 20.25%/yr for SIXA. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDEI charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.

Performance

CDEI vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 14.32% return.

CDEI

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 2.25%
• 6M: 9.37%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 1Y: 22.84%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIXA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 12.53%
• YTD: 14.32%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 20.25%
• 5Y*: 12.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDEI vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF	10.88%	16.60%	18.67%	22.82%
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	14.32%	15.52%	22.70%	9.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and SIXA is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023	0.71

The correlation between CDEI and SIXA shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CDEI vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CDEI	SIXA
Technology	44.4%	19.2%
Financial Services	14.4%	7.7%
Communication Services	11.4%	13.9%
Healthcare	9.8%	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	3.9%
Industrials	4.7%	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	23.2%
Utilities	2.0%	5.0%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.3%
Energy	0.4%	4.8%
Basic Materials	0.3%	-

Return for Risk

CDEI vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDEI

CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 68
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SIXA

SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 85
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDEI vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDEI	SIXA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.19	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.28	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.39	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.47	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.94	13.15	-3.22

CDEI vs. SIXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the SIXA Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and SIXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than SIXA's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and SIXA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDEI	SIXA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.46%	-18.38%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.88%	-5.59%	-4.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-11.22%	-8.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	0.00%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-2.96%	+0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	1.47%	+0.83%

Volatility

CDEI vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.46%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDEI	SIXA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	2.46%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.86%	6.89%	+2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	8.87%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.01%	12.78%	+2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.01%	13.28%	+1.73%

CDEI vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDEI vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SIXA's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF	0.98%	1.05%	1.22%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	2.00%	2.31%	1.62%	2.12%	2.23%	1.63%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDEI and SIXA in my portfolio?

CDEI and SIXA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDEI or SIXA?

CDEI has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to SIXA (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs SIXA's -18.38%.

Which ETF is better, CDEI or SIXA?

On 3-year performance, SIXA leads with 20.25% vs 17.99% for CDEI. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDEI or SIXA?

Over the 3-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 20.25% return vs 17.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDEI or SIXA?

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDEI or SIXA?

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.98% for CDEI.

What is the main difference between CDEI and SIXA?

They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.86% for SIXA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.