PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDEI vs. RSSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDEI vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.


CDEI

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.86%
YTD
9.87%
6M
10.18%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
10Y*

RSSY

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.78%
YTD
32.45%
6M
27.13%
1Y
47.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDEI vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and RSSY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024

0.59

The correlation between CDEI and RSSY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDEI vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDEI
CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSY
RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDEI vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDEIRSSYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

3.63

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

4.78

-1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.65

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

6.53

-3.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.67

22.39

-9.72

CDEI vs. RSSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the RSSY Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and RSSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDEIRSSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

3.63

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.75

+0.59

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and RSSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEIRSSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-29.57%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-7.36%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.16%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-7.37%

+5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.14%

+0.13%

Volatility

CDEI vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) at 2.30%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDEIRSSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.30%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

9.92%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

13.28%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

18.35%

-3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

18.35%

-3.33%

CDEI vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDEI vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than RSSY's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
0.96%1.05%1.22%1.16%
RSSY
Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
1.54%2.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDEI and RSSY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDEI has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to RSSY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs RSSY's -29.57%.

On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 28.56% for CDEI. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, RSSY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 28.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.96% for CDEI.

They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDEI and RSSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer