PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDE vs. BIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDE vs. BIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDE achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than BIB's 27.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CDE has underperformed BIB with an annualized return of 1.19%, while BIB has yielded a comparatively higher 7.33% annualized return.


CDE

1D
7.53%
1M
2.59%
6M
-15.91%
YTD
-2.13%
1Y
78.97%
3Y*
84.91%
5Y*
20.18%
10Y*
1.19%
ALL TIME*
-7.11%

BIB

1D
1.72%
1M
-4.18%
6M
19.55%
YTD
27.73%
1Y
98.74%
3Y*
26.81%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
7.33%
ALL TIME*
17.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$545.85K$915.16K$959.35K
$547.56M$455.55M$551.13M

CDE vs. BIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
-2.13%211.71%75.46%-2.98%-33.33%-51.30%28.09%80.76%-40.40%-17.49%
BIB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology
27.73%59.21%-9.84%-1.06%-28.85%-6.02%39.79%46.71%-24.93%40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CDE and BIB is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDE vs. BIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDE
CDE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BIB
BIB Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIB Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDE vs. BIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDEBIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

5.87

-4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.97

16.36

-13.38

CDE vs. BIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the BIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDE and BIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDE vs. BIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDE drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than BIB's maximum drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDE and BIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEBIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-67.24%

-32.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.79%

-16.92%

-30.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.79%

-45.30%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.43%

-65.86%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.42%

-66.20%

-21.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.95%

-7.23%

-86.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.54%

-32.53%

-49.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.64%

6.06%

+20.58%

Volatility

CDE vs. BIB - Volatility Comparison

Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) has a higher volatility of 19.22% compared to ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB) at 10.96%. This indicates that CDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDEBIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.22%

10.96%

+8.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.77%

31.57%

+21.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.62%

40.58%

+33.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.85%

43.70%

+25.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.90%

46.31%

+22.59%

Dividends

CDE vs. BIB - Dividend Comparison

CDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than BIB's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BIB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology
0.32%0.77%1.69%0.07%0.03%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDE and BIB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDE has higher volatility (19.22%) compared to BIB (10.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDE dropped -99.40% vs BIB's -67.24%.

BIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDE and BIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer