CDDYX vs. RFRAX
CDDYX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class) and RFRAX (Columbia Floating Rate Fund) are both mutual funds - CDDYX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia, while RFRAX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, CDDYX returned 12.63%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for RFRAX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDDYX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for RFRAX.
Performance
CDDYX vs. RFRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDDYX achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than RFRAX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CDDYX has outperformed RFRAX with an annualized return of 12.63%, while RFRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.
CDDYX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 20.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
RFRAX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
CDDYX vs. RFRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class | 11.40% | 15.95% | 15.17% | 10.65% | -4.84% | 26.43% | 7.92% | 28.74% | -4.27% | 20.34% |
RFRAX Columbia Floating Rate Fund | 1.58% | 5.83% | 6.55% | 11.01% | -2.90% | 4.53% | 1.03% | 7.60% | 0.08% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDDYX and RFRAX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CDDYX and RFRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDDYX vs. RFRAX — Risk / Return Rank
CDDYX
RFRAX
CDDYX vs. RFRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDDYX | RFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.55 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 2.40 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 8.16 | +5.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDDYX vs. RFRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDDYX drawdown since its inception was -32.74%, roughly equal to the maximum RFRAX drawdown of -33.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDDYX and RFRAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDDYX | RFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.74% | -33.04% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.51% | -1.72% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.99% | -2.57% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.91% | -6.90% | -10.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.74% | -21.74% | -11.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -2.25% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 0.50% | +0.96% |
Volatility
CDDYX vs. RFRAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) at 0.60%. This indicates that CDDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDDYX | RFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 0.60% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | 1.73% | +5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.14% | 2.24% | +6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 2.65% | +10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 3.81% | +11.84% |
CDDYX vs. RFRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDDYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RFRAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDDYX vs. RFRAX - Dividend Comparison
CDDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than RFRAX's 6.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class | 4.83% | 5.33% | 5.99% | 4.96% | 3.90% | 2.93% | 1.85% | 3.28% | 7.65% | 4.03% | 3.84% | 8.35% |
RFRAX Columbia Floating Rate Fund | 6.48% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.60% | 4.44% | 3.08% | 3.44% | 4.82% | 4.41% | 3.52% | 3.85% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDDYX and RFRAX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDDYX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to RFRAX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDDYX dropped -32.74% vs RFRAX's -33.04%.
CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDDYX and RFRAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer