PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDDYX vs. NSMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDDYX vs. NSMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (NSMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDDYX achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than NSMIX's 1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CDDYX has outperformed NSMIX with an annualized return of 12.63%, while NSMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return.


CDDYX

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.06%
YTD
8.07%
6M
8.50%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
12.63%

NSMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDDYX vs. NSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
8.07%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%
NSMIX
Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund
1.03%5.01%2.54%3.59%-3.06%0.57%1.95%3.24%1.46%1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CDDYX and NSMIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012

0.01

The correlation between CDDYX and NSMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.16 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDDYX vs. NSMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NSMIX
NSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDDYX vs. NSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (NSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDDYXNSMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

2.14

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

2.81

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

9.62

+4.41

CDDYX vs. NSMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the NSMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDDYX and NSMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDDYXNSMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

3.00

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.05

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

1.09

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.83

-0.96

Drawdowns

CDDYX vs. NSMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDDYX drawdown since its inception was -32.74%, which is greater than NSMIX's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDDYX and NSMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDDYXNSMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.74%

-5.20%

-27.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-1.45%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-1.97%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-5.20%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.74%

-5.20%

-27.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.31%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-0.37%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.42%

+1.04%

Volatility

CDDYX vs. NSMIX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (NSMIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that CDDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDDYXNSMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

0.48%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

1.06%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

1.36%

+7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

1.73%

+11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

1.57%

+14.12%

CDDYX vs. NSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDDYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NSMIX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDDYX vs. NSMIX - Dividend Comparison

CDDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than NSMIX's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.98%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%
NSMIX
Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund
2.90%3.58%2.81%2.01%1.31%0.95%1.45%1.93%1.64%1.33%1.04%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDDYX and NSMIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDDYX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to NSMIX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDDYX dropped -32.74% vs NSMIX's -5.20%.

NSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDDYX and NSMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer