PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDDYX vs. BCSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDDYX vs. BCSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDDYX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than BCSVX's -12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CDDYX has outperformed BCSVX with an annualized return of 12.57%, while BCSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.11% annualized return.


CDDYX

1D
-0.77%
1M
1.81%
YTD
7.99%
6M
8.79%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
12.57%

BCSVX

1D
-1.98%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-12.20%
6M
-13.19%
1Y
-21.09%
3Y*
0.19%
5Y*
-3.92%
10Y*
7.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDDYX vs. BCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
7.99%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
-12.20%-2.30%8.17%20.04%-31.56%12.69%44.75%26.41%-3.39%36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CDDYX and BCSVX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDDYX vs. BCSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BCSVX
BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDDYX vs. BCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDDYXBCSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.81

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

-0.65

+4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.40

-1.23

+15.64

CDDYX vs. BCSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the BCSVX Sharpe Ratio of -1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDDYX and BCSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDDYXBCSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

-1.24

+3.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

-0.21

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.42

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.44

+0.44

Drawdowns

CDDYX vs. BCSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDDYX drawdown since its inception was -32.74%, smaller than the maximum BCSVX drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDDYX and BCSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDDYXBCSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.74%

-43.93%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-32.35%

+26.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-32.35%

+19.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-43.93%

+27.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.74%

-43.93%

+11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-26.86%

+26.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-12.13%

+9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

17.02%

-15.56%

Volatility

CDDYX vs. BCSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) is 2.56%, while Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that CDDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDDYXBCSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

5.37%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

13.96%

-7.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.11%

17.02%

-7.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

18.68%

-5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

17.14%

-1.45%

CDDYX vs. BCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDDYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BCSVX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDDYX vs. BCSVX - Dividend Comparison

CDDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than BCSVX's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.07%0.74%0.30%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.98%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDDYX and BCSVX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCSVX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to CDDYX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDDYX dropped -32.74% vs BCSVX's -43.93%.

CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDDYX and BCSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer