PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCWSX vs. FINVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCWSX vs. FINVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) and Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCWSX achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than FINVX's 7.50% return.


CCWSX

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.83%
YTD
-4.40%
6M
-3.21%
1Y
1.91%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*

FINVX

1D
0.36%
1M
2.95%
YTD
7.50%
6M
11.64%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
22.98%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCWSX vs. FINVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCWSX
Chautauqua International Growth Fund
-4.40%19.17%11.30%12.16%-18.05%6.62%39.37%26.43%-17.36%34.60%
FINVX
Fidelity Series International Value Fund
7.50%45.75%6.20%20.35%-7.21%16.39%4.87%19.85%-16.40%19.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CCWSX and FINVX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.76

The correlation between CCWSX and FINVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCWSX vs. FINVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCWSX
CCWSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CCWSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCWSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCWSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CCWSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCWSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FINVX
FINVX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCWSX vs. FINVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) and Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCWSXFINVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.29

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

2.31

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

8.58

-8.38

CCWSX vs. FINVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCWSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the FINVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCWSX and FINVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCWSXFINVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

1.62

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.81

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.37

+0.17

Drawdowns

CCWSX vs. FINVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCWSX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum FINVX drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCWSX and FINVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCWSXFINVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-42.48%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.75%

-10.38%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.75%

-14.60%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-27.13%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.59%

-1.12%

-7.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-9.04%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

2.79%

+4.31%

Volatility

CCWSX vs. FINVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) is 4.34%, while Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that CCWSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FINVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCWSXFINVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.80%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

11.94%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

14.84%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

16.71%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

18.06%

+0.40%

CCWSX vs. FINVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCWSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FINVX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCWSX vs. FINVX - Dividend Comparison

CCWSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than FINVX's 10.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCWSX
Chautauqua International Growth Fund
1.49%1.43%0.45%0.16%0.80%0.47%0.28%1.85%2.25%3.31%0.00%0.00%
FINVX
Fidelity Series International Value Fund
10.42%11.20%4.14%3.29%3.33%5.01%2.83%4.05%4.05%3.14%2.62%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCWSX and FINVX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FINVX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to CCWSX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCWSX dropped -34.59% vs FINVX's -42.48%.

FINVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCWSX and FINVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer