CCVAX vs. SSCDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCVAX (Calvert Small-Cap Fund) and SSCDX (Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CCVAX returned 7.78%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for SSCDX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CCVAX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SSCDX.

Performance

CCVAX vs. SSCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Small-Cap Fund (CCVAX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCVAX achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than SSCDX's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CCVAX has underperformed SSCDX with an annualized return of 7.78%, while SSCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.

CCVAX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: -1.62%
• 3Y*: 4.22%
• 5Y*: 1.18%
• 10Y*: 7.78%

SSCDX

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 6M: 16.19%
• 1Y: 32.90%
• 3Y*: 19.16%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCVAX vs. SSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCVAX Calvert Small-Cap Fund	2.13%	-6.30%	11.92%	11.45%	-16.14%	19.81%	14.64%	26.02%	-6.94%	13.42%
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	16.85%	12.90%	15.50%	15.50%	-17.15%	23.46%	16.21%	27.12%	-17.10%	13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CCVAX and SSCDX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2015	0.93

The correlation between CCVAX and SSCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CCVAX vs. SSCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCVAX

CCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 3
CCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SSCDX

SSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 64
SSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCVAX vs. SSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Small-Cap Fund (CCVAX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCVAX	SSCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	2.16	-2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	3.01	-2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.37	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.02	4.28	-4.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.04	15.11	-15.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCVAX vs. SSCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCVAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the SSCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCVAX and SSCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCVAX	SSCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	2.16	-2.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.46	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.52	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.48	-0.16

Drawdowns

CCVAX vs. SSCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCVAX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, which is greater than SSCDX's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCVAX and SSCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCVAX	SSCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.18%	-38.79%	-16.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.23%	-8.22%	-5.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.02%	-23.99%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-27.06%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	-38.79%	+2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.88%	-2.10%	-9.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-7.00%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.94%	2.33%	+3.61%

Volatility

CCVAX vs. SSCDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Small-Cap Fund (CCVAX) is 4.58%, while Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that CCVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCVAX	SSCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	5.04%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.19%	12.06%	-0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	16.33%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.92%	20.09%	-1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.98%	20.70%	-0.72%

CCVAX vs. SSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCVAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCDX's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCVAX vs. SSCDX - Dividend Comparison

CCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.83%, more than SSCDX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCVAX Calvert Small-Cap Fund	13.83%	14.12%	1.47%	0.12%	1.43%	7.26%	0.00%	1.23%	5.97%	14.34%	1.39%	9.12%
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	1.83%	2.21%	1.79%	1.07%	4.26%	8.47%	0.77%	1.33%	2.69%	0.85%	1.16%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCVAX and SSCDX in my portfolio?

CCVAX and SSCDX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCVAX or SSCDX?

SSCDX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to CCVAX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCVAX dropped -55.18% vs SSCDX's -38.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.