CCSZX vs. FCGCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CCSZX (Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund) and FCGCX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, CCSZX returned 7.83%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for FCGCX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCSZX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for FCGCX.

Performance

CCSZX vs. FCGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSZX achieves a 30.26% return, which is significantly higher than FCGCX's 24.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CCSZX has underperformed FCGCX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while FCGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.06% annualized return.

CCSZX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 30.26%
• 6M: 29.06%
• 1Y: 42.98%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 7.83%

FCGCX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 24.19%
• 6M: 26.21%
• 1Y: 50.83%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: 12.38%
• 10Y*: 12.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSZX vs. FCGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	30.26%	15.36%	7.11%	-6.90%	15.80%	31.34%	-1.17%	7.45%	-14.09%	1.71%
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C	24.19%	27.29%	1.90%	-6.06%	19.45%	24.85%	4.96%	16.74%	-14.07%	17.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSZX and FCGCX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2012	0.57

The correlation between CCSZX and FCGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CCSZX vs. FCGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSZX

CCSZX Risk / Return Rank: 80
CCSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CCSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CCSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CCSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CCSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FCGCX

FCGCX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FCGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FCGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FCGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FCGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSZX vs. FCGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCSZX	FCGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	3.13	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	3.95	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.53	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.37	6.86	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.47	24.54	-7.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCSZX vs. FCGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FCGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSZX and FCGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCSZX	FCGCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	3.13	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.58	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.54	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.31	-0.14

Drawdowns

CCSZX vs. FCGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSZX drawdown since its inception was -61.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FCGCX drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSZX and FCGCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSZX	FCGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.34%	-59.67%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-7.45%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.17%	-19.96%	+8.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.86%	-27.43%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.16%	-49.31%	+15.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.09%	-1.55%	-1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.35%	-21.20%	-10.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	2.08%	+0.41%

Volatility

CCSZX vs. FCGCX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) at 4.33%. This indicates that CCSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSZX	FCGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	4.33%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.46%	13.29%	+1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.51%	16.33%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.96%	21.38%	-4.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	22.43%	-7.50%

CCSZX vs. FCGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than FCGCX's 1.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSZX vs. FCGCX - Dividend Comparison

CCSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than FCGCX's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	2.30%	3.00%	8.84%	4.42%	94.73%	36.39%	0.13%	1.09%	18.52%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C	1.19%	1.48%	1.38%	0.80%	1.09%	2.41%	0.59%	1.94%	1.11%	0.36%	0.71%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSZX and FCGCX in my portfolio?

CCSZX and FCGCX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSZX or FCGCX?

CCSZX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to FCGCX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSZX dropped -61.34% vs FCGCX's -59.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.